NEW DELHI: The Union ecosystem ministry on Wednesday rebutted the Environmental Efficiency Index 2022, which rated India at the base of a checklist of 180 nations around the world, saying some of the indicators it used are “extrapolated and centered on surmises and unscientific methods”.
The index released not too long ago by the Yale Middle for Environmental Regulation and Plan and the Center for International Earth Science Data Community, Columbia University, applied 40 overall performance indicators throughout 11 categories to choose international locations on local weather change general performance, environmental overall health and ecosystem vitality.
“The Environmental Effectiveness Index (EPI) 2022 unveiled not long ago has several indicators based mostly on unfounded assumptions. Some of these indicators utilized for assessing functionality are extrapolated and centered on surmises and unscientific solutions,” the ministry claimed in a statement.
“A new indicator in the local climate plan objective is ‘projected GHG emissions ranges in 2050’. This is computed dependent on the regular charge of change in emission of the past 10 years as a substitute of modelling that requires into account a longer time interval, extent of renewable energy potential and use, added carbon sinks, power efficiency and many others. of respective nations around the world,” the ministry stated.
Forests and wetlands of the country are important carbon sinks but have not been factored in though computing the projected GHG emissions trajectory up to 2050 presented by EPI 2022. Historical facts on the most affordable emission trajectory has been ignored in the computation, it said although rejecting the investigation.
The ministry mentioned the body weight of the indicators in which India done properly has been lessened and the explanations for this sort of improve have not been explained in the report.
“The basic principle of equity is offered quite low weightage in the type of indicators like GHG emission per capita and GHG Emission depth pattern. The CBDR-RC principle is also hardly reflected in the composition of the index,” it mentioned.
Prevalent but Differentiated Tasks and Respective Capabilities (CBDR–RC) acknowledges the diverse abilities and differing duties of personal nations around the world in addressing climate change.
The indicators on h2o excellent, water use performance, waste technology for every capita which are closely linked to sustainable use and creation are not involved in the Index, the ministry stated.
“The index emphasises the extent of guarded places alternatively than the high-quality of security that they afford. Administration, performance and analysis of secured locations and eco-delicate regions is not factored into the computation of biodiversity indices,” it mentioned.
The index computes the extent of ecosystems but not their issue or efficiency. It did not contain indicators like agro biodiversity, soil overall health, food stuff loss and squander even nevertheless they are vital for producing nations around the world with massive agrarian populations.
The index released not too long ago by the Yale Middle for Environmental Regulation and Plan and the Center for International Earth Science Data Community, Columbia University, applied 40 overall performance indicators throughout 11 categories to choose international locations on local weather change general performance, environmental overall health and ecosystem vitality.
“The Environmental Effectiveness Index (EPI) 2022 unveiled not long ago has several indicators based mostly on unfounded assumptions. Some of these indicators utilized for assessing functionality are extrapolated and centered on surmises and unscientific solutions,” the ministry claimed in a statement.
“A new indicator in the local climate plan objective is ‘projected GHG emissions ranges in 2050’. This is computed dependent on the regular charge of change in emission of the past 10 years as a substitute of modelling that requires into account a longer time interval, extent of renewable energy potential and use, added carbon sinks, power efficiency and many others. of respective nations around the world,” the ministry stated.
Forests and wetlands of the country are important carbon sinks but have not been factored in though computing the projected GHG emissions trajectory up to 2050 presented by EPI 2022. Historical facts on the most affordable emission trajectory has been ignored in the computation, it said although rejecting the investigation.
The ministry mentioned the body weight of the indicators in which India done properly has been lessened and the explanations for this sort of improve have not been explained in the report.
“The basic principle of equity is offered quite low weightage in the type of indicators like GHG emission per capita and GHG Emission depth pattern. The CBDR-RC principle is also hardly reflected in the composition of the index,” it mentioned.
Prevalent but Differentiated Tasks and Respective Capabilities (CBDR–RC) acknowledges the diverse abilities and differing duties of personal nations around the world in addressing climate change.
The indicators on h2o excellent, water use performance, waste technology for every capita which are closely linked to sustainable use and creation are not involved in the Index, the ministry stated.
“The index emphasises the extent of guarded places alternatively than the high-quality of security that they afford. Administration, performance and analysis of secured locations and eco-delicate regions is not factored into the computation of biodiversity indices,” it mentioned.
The index computes the extent of ecosystems but not their issue or efficiency. It did not contain indicators like agro biodiversity, soil overall health, food stuff loss and squander even nevertheless they are vital for producing nations around the world with massive agrarian populations.
